HEALTHCARE · PRODUCT DESIGN · 2013–2015 · SHIPPED
Problem: Audiologists and surgeons struggled to find fitting software and training spread across separate pages.
What I did: As lead designer, ran interviews and a card sort, and designed role-based onboarding, a card dashboard and persistent navigation.
Outcome: Shipped in 11 languages. Trainers found setup easier and support requests about finding resources dropped.
SURFACE
myMED-EL for Professionals
Secure web portal
Healthcare professionals
ROLE
Product Designer
Lead Design
UX/UI + Research
SCOPE
Software downloads + training
Resource library + navigation
Onboarding + localisation
Due to professional restrictions and / or the collaborative nature of these projects, specific research artifacts (e.g., user flows and interviews, heatmaps, internal documentation) cannot be shared; illustrative artifacts will be used instead. This case study focuses on design rationale, visual direction, and my role in the creative process.
THE CHALLENGE
Between January 2013 and August 2015, I worked on the redesign and consolidation of myMED-EL for Professionals, a secure portal for audiologists, surgeons and other clinical partners. I was the lead designer on the project. The work covered how professionals accessed training, downloaded software such as MAESTRO and found material that had previously been spread across different parts of MED-EL’s online presence.
The portal had to work across different user types and languages, while fitting the security and regulatory requirements around a medical-device company. I worked with clinical trainers, regulatory stakeholders and the digital team in Innsbruck while the portal was being redesigned and built.

myMED-EL for professionals home page
RESEARCH → PRODUCT DEFINITION
Research included stakeholder interviews, a content audit and the usage data we had available. I spoke with audiologists, clinical trainers and internal support staff about how they were using the existing material. Finding fitting software came up repeatedly: downloads could sit behind inconsistent menus or outdated links, alongside a large amount of documentation spread across separate pages.
We also used a simple card-sorting exercise while reorganising the resources. I mapped journeys for different roles, from an audiologist working in a private clinic to people working inside larger institutions. That work fed into decisions around access, localisation and onboarding.
From research findings to product decisions
| Fitting software was difficult to find Inconsistent menus and outdated links made downloads harder to locate. | DECISION Give software downloads a clear destination and surface them among the dashboard’s core actions. |
| Professionals had different roles and needs Journeys varied across audiologists, clinic administrators and trainers. | DECISION Collect role and relevant preferences during onboarding to shape the initial dashboard. |
| Resources were spread across separate pages Training and documentation required users to search across different parts of the online experience. | DECISION Bring the main resources together through a card-based dashboard and persistent navigation. |
STRUCTURE → USER FLOWS
I used lightweight personas and user journeys to work through how audiologists, clinic administrators and MED-EL trainers would use the portal. We also mapped the systems behind it, including Salesforce, SFTP, regulatory content and training systems, because several of the things users saw in the interface depended on those connections.
I started with low-fidelity wireflows and later developed mid-fidelity screens. We reviewed the work regularly with the team in Innsbruck. During that process, onboarding was reduced to a three-step wizard rather than asking new users to work through the portal without much guidance.


PRODUCT DIRECTION
Once the main flows were in place, I started working through different interface directions. The concepts were reviewed against the tasks we had heard about during research and the technical limits of the portal.
PRODUCT DECISION 1/4 · ROLE-BASED ONBOARDING
Guide setup around the professional’s role
During an early soft launch, we introduced a small group to parts of the application with a basic onboarding experience. The platform was still at an early stage, and the initial approach gave users considerable freedom to explore.
That freedom made the experience more complicated than we expected and raised new questions about how to use the platform. We collected those questions, reviewed them together and shared the findings with the wider team.
The review led us to introduce a guided onboarding wizard with three core steps. It collected context such as profession, implant focus and language preference, helping shape the dashboard from the first login. The aim was to give new users a clearer understanding of the platform and support adoption by providing guidance before open exploration.
PRODUCT DECISION 2/4 · TASK HIERARCHY
Bring core tasks into the dashboard
Designed a lightweight interface with core actions (Software Downloads, Training Hub, Resource Library) surfaced as interactive cards. Emphasis was placed on clarity, hierarchy, and adaptability across devices.
PRODUCT DECISION 3/4 · CLINICAL RELIABILITY
Prioritise reliability in clinical use
Tested more dynamic ideas like a draggable “resource shelf,” but deprioritized them due to performance concerns and the need for reliability in clinical environments.
PRODUCT DECISION 4/4 · PERSISTENT NAVIGATION
Keep navigation visible across modules
Final direction included a fixed, minimal sidebar allowing users to quickly jump between modules without losing orientation ~ ensuring role-specific workflows remained intuitive and efficient.



IMPLEMENTATION & DELIVERY
After the designs were approved, I worked with development and QA during implementation, including responsive behaviour and the different language versions.









The modular onboarding wizard was implemented first, feeding user preferences directly into personalized dashboard states. Core modules ~ including the Download Center and Training Hub ~ were rolled out in stages, with built-in analytics hooks to track engagement and friction points from day one.
The dashboard was organised into separate cards for software downloads, training and other frequently used resources.
I worked with the legal and clinical documentation teams to review the portal’s privacy, access and documentation requirements.
The platform launched initially in English and German, followed by 9 additional language variants. Internal feedback from clinical trainers was overwhelmingly positive, especially regarding the reduced complexity in guiding new partners through setup.
OUTCOME · SHIPPED PORTAL
11 LANGUAGES
The portal launched in English and German, followed by nine additional language versions.
CLEARER PARTNER SETUP
Clinical trainers reported that the new onboarding made it easier to guide new partners through setup.
FEWER RESOURCE -FINDING REQUESTS
After rollout, we saw fewer support requests from people who couldn’t find resources in the portal.
REFLECTION
This was the first time I had worked on a product specifically for healthcare professionals. Their day-to-day context was very different from a public website: they were logging in to find software, training or documentation and usually had a specific task they wanted to finish.
The work involved clinical trainers, regulatory, development and localisation, so changes often had consequences outside the interface itself. One piece of feedback I remember was that trainers found it easier to guide new clinics through setup after the new onboarding was introduced.
If I were to revisit this project, I’d love to go deeper into personalization based on implant types, and explore lightweight ways to visualize patient progress as part of the HCP experience.




